Downing Street made clear yesterday that MPs who objected would not be given a chance to overturn the report in the Commons. It issued a statement saying that a minister, likely to be Harriet Harman, the Leader of the House, would make a statement after the report is released on Wednesday. MPs will be given a chance to debate it. It will be for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), however, to devise and inflatable administer the new scheme, which will come in after the general election.

“The Parliamentary Standards Act provides that the IPSA must consult MPs when drawing up the expenses regime, but not seek their final approval,” a Downing Street spokesman said.

“They will not need to seek Parliament’s consent for the expenses regime. MPs have agreed the Parliamentary Standards Act that takes the setting of their expenses out of their hands.” This inflatable bouncer appeared to be an attempt by some senior MPs to find a way of voting down the proposals.

MPs tried to argue yesterday that their right to claim mortgage interest on their second homes was enshrined in legislation passed by John Biffen, the former Tory leader of the House, in 1985. They said that fresh legislation was needed to overturn the rules, which would have to be debated in the Commons and then voted on — presenting an inflatable castles opportunity to throw out Sir Christopher’s proposals.

Downing Street said that it had checked with its lawyers, and MPs would not be able to force a vote this way. However, its argument was undermined when it emerged that Jack Straw had promised the Commons on June 29 that it would get the right to “approve” the Kelly proposals.

MPs who stand down at an election will lose their £60,000 “golden goodbyes” as part of reforms to the expenses regime, storing up huge problems in future for party leaders.

Sir Christopher Kelly, the chairman of the pearl jewelry Committee on Standards in Public Life, is understood to be planning to scrap the resettlement grant after the next but one general election for MPs who voluntarily stand down at an election. Incumbents who are defeated will still be able to claim the payment, worth £32,383 to £64,766, depending on length of service, but Sir Christopher is likely to suggest that those who decide not to stand again receive a couple of months’ salary.

This is likely to cause problems for party managers since it removes the financial incentive for MPs to stay until a general election and might mean more of them standing down in the middle of a Parliament, triggering potentially embarrassing by-elections.

It will also pearl jewelry wholesale encourage “bed blockers” — MPs in marginal seats — to stay in place in case they lose so that they can claim the money, rather than announcing their retirement before a general election to give way for fresh blood. These proposals are likely to be greeted with reluctance by the party whips.
Related Links

In another significant change, Sir Christopher will recommend an end to the communications allowance, a £10,400 budget that MPs can use to spend on websites and leaflets to promote their work. This is a big bonus for incumbents, and has been opposed vigorously by the Conservatives, who said that they would scrap it if they came to power.

Sir Christopher may also step beyond his pearl necklace remit and suggest reform of working hours, to bring them into line with more traditional jobs. He is understood to believe that many of the MPs’ allowances stem from their unusual working hours, and bringing them more closely in line with traditional 9-5 jobs would end this. If his plan relies on additional reforms beyond his remit, there will be uproar.

The revelations come on top of the plans that emerged on Tuesday that MPs whose local railway station is within 60 minutes of Westminster would not be entitled to second-home payments, that the allowances would cover only rent, not mortgage interest, and that relatives would be pearl jewelry banned from working in Parliament.

Downing Street made clear yesterday that MPs who objected would not be given a chance to overturn the report in the Commons. It issued a statement saying that a minister, likely to be Harriet Harman, the Leader of the House, would make a statement after the report is released on Wednesday. MPs will be given a chance to debate it. It will be for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), however, to devise and administer the new scheme, which will come in after the general election.

“The Parliamentary Standards Act pearl jewelry wholesale provides that the IPSA must consult MPs when drawing up the expenses regime, but not seek their final approval,” a Downing Street spokesman said.

“They will not need to seek Parliament’s consent for the expenses regime. MPs have agreed the Parliamentary Standards Act that takes the setting of their expenses out of their hands.” This appeared to be an attempt by some senior MPs to find a way of voting down the proposals.

MPs tried to argue yesterday that their right to claim mortgage interest on their second homes was enshrined in legislation passed by John Biffen, the former Tory leader of the House, in 1985. They said that fresh legislation was needed to overturn the rules, which would have to be debated in the Commons and then voted on — presenting an opportunity to throw out Sir Christopher’s proposals.

Downing Street said that it wholesale pearl jewelry had checked with its lawyers, and MPs would not be able to force a vote this way. However, its argument was undermined when it emerged that Jack Straw had promised the Commons on June 29 that it would get the right to “approve” the Kelly proposals.

The Ministry of Defence and Britain’s largest defence company were officially blamed yesterday for the deaths of 14 servicemen who were killed when an RAF Nimrod surveillance aircraft burst into flames over Afghanistan three years ago.

In one of the most damning official reports published, the MoD was accused of sacrificing the safety of members of the Armed Forces to cut costs. The ministry was guilty of a “systemic breach of the freshwater pearl military covenant” between the nation and the men and women of the Forces, the report said.

“Airworthiness was a casualty of the process of cuts, change, dilution and distraction,” Charles Haddon-Cave, QC, concluded after a 20-month review of the background to the disaster on September 2, 2006, which represented the single biggest loss of life of service personnel in one incident since the Falklands conflict in 1982.

He named ten individuals whom he blamed for playing principal roles in the failure to ensure that Nimrods were safe: five from the MoD, three from BAE Systems, which reviewed Nimrod’s safety, and two from QinetiQ, the company formed from the MoD’s research freshwater pearl jewelry agency, which monitored its safety in an advisory role.
Related Links

Bob Ainsworth, Defence Secretary, told the Commons yesterday: “I am sorry for the mistakes that have been made, and that lives have been lost as a result of our failure.”

Two of the named officers involved in the Nimrod integrated project team are still serving — Group Captain George Baber, now promoted to air commodore, and Wing Commander Michael Eagles — although they have been moved to different posts. The RAF said they pearl jewelry wholesale had switched jobs as part of the normal career structure.

Trish Knight, whose son, Sergeant Ben Knight, was killed, called for resignations “from the very top over the lies they have been telling us since 2006”. “This is disgraceful. It’s what we said all along,” she said. “The MoD tried to tell us everything was fine.” Joe Windall, whose son Marine Joseph Windall also died, said he was “shocked and severely disappointed” by the failures highlighted. “The inefficiencies of someone caused me to lose my son,” he said. The families are seeking compensation. 

There had been signs before the disaster that the Nimrod MR2, of which aircraft XV230 was one, had design faults, notably the juxtaposition of fuel pipes with hot-air ducts which presented a “catastrophic fire risk”. Mr Haddon-Cave said new evidence had revealed that fuel had overflowed into a dry tank during air-to-air refuelling. But when BAE Systems carried out a safety review between 2001 and 2005, the flaw was not discovered.

“The Nimrod safety case was a pearl jewelry lamentable job from start to finish,” the report said. “It was riddled with errors. It missed the key dangers. Its production is a story of incompetence, complacency and cynicism. The best opportunity to prevent the accident to XV230 was, tragically, lost.” Mr Haddon-Cave said the Nimrod safety review was “fatally undermined by a general malaise: a widespread assumption by those involved that the Nimrod was ‘safe anyway’ (because it had flown successfully for 30 years) and the task of drawing up the safety case became essentially a paperwork and ‘tick-box’ exercise”.

The MoD announced in March that any Nimrod that had not had its hot-air duct removed — the perceived design fault identified in the RAF’s board of inquiry report in December 2007 — would not be flown until the work was done. An RAF spokesman said all 11 Nimrod MR2s at RAF Kinloss in Morayshire and three MR1s at RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire had now had the air ducts removed. No Nimrod is flying in Afghanistan. Mr Haddon-Cave said of those on the aircraft: “Faced with a life-threatening emergency, every member of the crew of XV230 acted with calmness, bravery and professionalism, and in accordance with their training. They had no chance, however, of controlling the fire. Their fate was already sealed before the first fire warning.”

If the Nimrod safety case by BAE Systems, monitored by QinetiQ, had been drawn up “with proper skill, care and attention, the catastrophic fire risks dormant within the wholesale pearl jewelry Nimrod MR2 fleet would have been identified and dealt with, and the loss of XV230 in September 2006 would have been avoided”, Mr Haddon-Cave said.

He likened the organisational causes to those of other disasters, in particular the loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia in 2003, the sinking of the ferry Herald of Free Enterprise in 1987, the King’s Cross Underground station fire in 1987 and the Marchioness riverboat’s sinking in 1989.

Poor procurement practices had damaging effects. The Nimrod MR2 should have been replaced by the Nimrod MRA4, but the programme had been delayed. “But for the delays in the Nimrod MRA4 replacement programme, XV230 would probably no longer have been flying in September 2006,” Mr Haddon-Cave said.

A former RAF officer had told his inquiry: “There pearl jewelry wholesale was no doubt that the culture of the time had switched. In the days of the RAF chief engineer in the 1990s, you had to be on top of airworthiness. By 2004 you had to be on top of your budget if you wanted to get ahead.”